GLOBAL WARMING QUESTIONS
1. Why have 3 of our closest planetary neighbors experienced the same proportional temperature changes we have? Are there SUVs and cow farts on Mars?
2. Why have measurements made by the most accurate devices known to man today, such as satellites and probes that are placed throughout our oceans that periodically submerge themselves deep in the ocean to measure the oceans temperature, all tell us that the planet has not warmed in more than 10 years?
3. Why back in the 1930s were we being warned about global cooling, then in the 1950s it was global warming, then in the 1970s it was global cooling, and now warming again? If you go back to the 50s and 70s and read publications like Newsweek you would see they use the same key phrases to convince people, like "scientific consensus".
4. Why every time they find a "glitch" in software or other data gathering systems or devises it's always in favor of warming? For example: When just last year the satellite software used to measure sea ice in the arctic was discovered to have a "glitch". When the "glitch" was corrected it showed 500,000 more square miles of ice. (I think that’s about the size of Texas) bringing the ice levels to that of around 1970. When the model used to produce the infamous "hockey stick" graph was released to the public it was found to make the "hockey stick" pattern no matter what data was entered. When corrected the "hockey stick" magically disappeared.
5. Why, is a majority of the public convinced that the the planets temperature is directly affected by the amount of carbon in our atmosphere when in fact the data shows, contrary to Al Gore's mocumentary, that the carbon levels rose AFTER the planets temperature, by about a few hundred years?
6. Why in the distant past, before man even existed, was the Earth so warm it had no ice at all at either poles? Maybe "dinosaur-made global warming"?
7. Why as recently as 10,000 years ago was there a quarter mile thick sheet of ice year round right were I sit?
I do not see any of these questions as being unreasonable, and in fact see them as relevant.
The only way anyone could still believe all the "man-made global warming" hype they must hand pick the data they choose to "believe". After this recent email scandal which exposed massive fraud committed by scientists whose data was used in virtually every major global warming study, there is no way any scientifically thinking person could not at least question everything they have been led to believe.
Many, many more scientists are changing over to the ANTI man-made global warming, oops I mean ANTI climate change side. They are not going the other way. I predict that in about five more years the general public will realize how this "man-made global warming" crap has been completely debunked, despite the reporting by the media and the many political groups, and this will be a huge I TOLD YOU SO!
This is THE biggest scientific scam in the history of science! Why is the media not reporting it as such?